HEPA vs ULPA Filter: Efficiency Classes, MPPS and Cleanroom Use
HEPA and ULPA filters are both high-performance air filters made of fine glass-fiber (or similar) media folded into pleats. They are mounted in cleanroom ceilings or fan filter units to remove airborne particles. The difference is efficiency. The Japanese JIS terminology standard (JIS Z 8122) defines a HEPA filter as capturing at least 99.97% of 0.3 µm particles at rated airflow, and an ULPA filter as capturing at least 99.9995% of 0.15 µm particles. The European standard EN 1822-1 instead grades filters by their efficiency at the most penetrating particle size (MPPS): classes H13 and H14 are HEPA, and U15 to U17 are ULPA. ULPA filters stop more particles but, at the same airflow, have a higher pressure drop and cost more, so the choice follows the required cleanliness.
| Aspect | HEPA filter | ULPA filter |
|---|---|---|
| What the name means | High Efficiency Particulate Air | Ultra Low Penetration Air |
| JIS definition (JIS Z 8122) | At least 99.97% of 0.3 µm particles captured at rated airflow | At least 99.9995% of 0.15 µm particles captured at rated airflow |
| EN 1822-1 classes (overall efficiency at MPPS) | H13: at least 99.95%; H14: at least 99.995% | U15: at least 99.9995%; U16: at least 99.99995%; U17: at least 99.999995% |
| Share of particles that get through | At most 0.05% for H13 and 0.005% for H14 (5 in 10,000 and 5 in 100,000) | At most 0.0005% for U15 (5 in a million); each class step cuts it by a factor of 10 |
| Most penetrating particle size (MPPS) | Depends on the media, typically about 0.1 to 0.3 µm; larger particles are caught by inertia and interception, smaller ones by diffusion | Same mechanisms, typically about 0.1 to 0.3 µm; the denser media lets fewer particles through even at this size |
| Pressure drop and cost | Lower pressure drop at the same airflow, so fan power and price are easier to keep down | Tends to have a higher pressure drop at the same airflow, so fan power and price rise |
| Typical cleanroom use | Areas around ISO Class 5 to 8, operating rooms, pharmaceutical plants; in chip fabs, bays with relaxed cleanliness | ISO Class 4 and cleaner, and places that need especially clean air, such as the mini-environments of fab tools |
| What they cannot remove | Gaseous airborne molecular contamination (AMC) such as ammonia and organics; a separate chemical filter is needed | Likewise cannot remove gases; where boron released from glass-fiber media is a problem, low-boron or PTFE media are used |
Figures are typical orders of magnitude and vary by process generation and product.