2.5D vs 3D Packaging: Chip Integration Compared
Both approaches put several chips into one package to get more bandwidth than a circuit board can offer. In 2.5D packaging, chips sit side by side on a silicon interposer that wires them together at fine pitch. In 3D packaging, chips are stacked on top of each other and connected through the silicon with through-silicon vias (TSVs) or by hybrid bonding. 3D gives the shortest connections but is harder to cool and to build.
| Aspect | 2.5D | 3D |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Chips placed side by side on a silicon interposer (or a silicon bridge) | Chips stacked vertically on top of one another |
| Interconnect | Micro-bumps to the interposer, with very fine wiring layers inside it | TSVs through the chips, joined by micro-bumps or by hybrid bonding |
| Bandwidth density | High | Highest, because connections are shortest |
| Heat | Easier: each chip can be cooled from the top | Harder: heat from lower chips must pass through the chips above |
| Footprint | Larger: the interposer must hold all chips | Smaller |
| Manufacturing difficulty | Needs a large interposer, which adds cost | Needs wafer thinning to tens of micrometers, TSV formation and careful testing of each die |
| Typical examples | AI GPUs with HBM on the same package (such as TSMC CoWoS) | HBM itself (stacked DRAM dies), and stacked cache on a processor |
| Typical uses | Connecting processors, memory and chiplets | Stacking memory, or stacking logic and cache for the shortest paths |
Figures are typical orders of magnitude and vary by process generation and product.