Automotive Semiconductors and Functional Safety

Which correctly describes the concept of automotive functional safety?

  1. AUsing only high-quality components to bring the component failure rate to zero, guaranteeing that no failure of any kind ever occurs during the vehicle's service life
  2. BDesigning the vehicle so that accidents never occur no matter what incorrect operation the driver performs
  3. CNot eliminating failures, but reducing risk to an acceptable level, for example by detecting failures when they occur and transitioning to a safe state
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Not eliminating failures, but reducing risk to an acceptable level, for example by detecting failures when they occur and transitioning to a safe state

Since component failures cannot be eliminated completely, functional safety aims to prevent a hazardous situation when a failure occurs. For example, if an anomaly is detected in the motor control of electric power steering, assist is stopped, a warning lamp notifies the driver, and the system moves to a state in which the driver can steer manually. ISO 26262 defines functional safety as the absence of unreasonable risk due to hazards caused by malfunctioning behavior of E/E systems. It does not guarantee that accidents will never happen.

Practice this topic Back to topic

Books on Automotive Semiconductors and Functional Safety Ad

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

More Automotive Semiconductors and Functional Safety questions

  1. In ISO 26262, which correctly lists the three factors evaluated when determining the ASIL through hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)?
  2. Which correctly describes the ASIL in ISO 26262?
  3. A hazardous event was assessed as severity S3, exposure E4 and controllability C3, giving ASIL D. If, for the same event, only controllability were C2 (most drivers can normally avoid the hazard), what would the ASIL be?
  4. Which correctly describes a "safety goal" in ISO 26262?
  5. Which correctly pairs the descriptions of random hardware failures and systematic failures as distinguished in ISO 26262?