Hardware Security: Advanced Topics and Trends

Which correctly describes the idea of composition emphasized in PSA Certified and SESIP, security certification frameworks for IoT devices?

  1. AWhen a product is built on a certified chip or root of trust, its evaluation results are reused, and the device maker is evaluated mainly on the parts it added
  2. BA device cannot be certified at all unless every component in it is designed and manufactured by a single company
  3. CIf a certified chip is used, the whole device is regarded as certified and secure even if the applications running on it have vulnerabilities
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. When a product is built on a certified chip or root of trust, its evaluation results are reused, and the device maker is evaluated mainly on the parts it added

IoT devices come in many varieties, and putting each one through a heavy evaluation such as Common Criteria is costly in money and time. PSA Certified (a framework by Arm and others started in 2019) and SESIP defined by GlobalPlatform (an evaluation method that later also became the European standard EN 17927) take a compositional approach: each layer, such as the chip, the root of trust and the OS, is evaluated, and higher layers build their evaluations on those results. Device makers can thus choose certified components and concentrate on evaluating what they added. However, certification of lower layers does not guarantee the security of higher layers, so the higher layers must be evaluated and the conditions of use for the components must be observed.

  • A. Correct. The evaluation results of lower layers are reused in evaluating higher layers.
  • B. The approach assumes components from different companies are combined.
  • C. Certification of lower layers does not guarantee freedom from vulnerabilities in the software of higher layers.
Practice this topic Back to topic

Books on Hardware Security: Advanced Topics and Trends Ad

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

More Hardware Security: Advanced Topics and Trends questions

  1. Which is the most appropriate design for authenticated debugging that lets only the manufacturer's engineers open the debug port of shipped products?
  2. The lifecycle state of a security chip is managed in stages such as test, production and failure analysis of returned parts (RMA). Which is an appropriate way to handle moving from the production state to the RMA state for failure analysis?
  3. Which correctly pairs the reason why scan chains for scan testing can become an attack path in a chip that performs cryptographic processing with a countermeasure?
  4. Which correctly explains the main reason a chip malfunctions under a voltage glitch that lowers the supply voltage for an instant?
  5. Among fault injection attacks, which correctly pairs the characteristics of methods using a laser and methods using electromagnetic pulses?