Control Engineering Basics
Which of the following correctly describes integral windup?
- AA phenomenon in which the derivative term amplifies noise and the manipulated variable keeps oscillating finely; it is prevented by adding a low-pass filter to the derivative
- BA phenomenon in which a steady-state error persists because the sampling period in the integral calculation was made too long
- CA phenomenon in which the integral term keeps accumulating the error while the manipulated variable is stuck at its upper limit, so the manipulated variable does not come down for a while even after the error changes sign, causing a large overshoot
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. A phenomenon in which the integral term keeps accumulating the error while the manipulated variable is stuck at its upper limit, so the manipulated variable does not come down for a while even after the error changes sign, causing a large overshoot
Manipulated variables such as a motor voltage or a valve opening have upper and lower limits. When a large error continues and the manipulated variable saturates at its upper limit, the manipulated variable cannot increase any further, yet the integral term keeps accumulating the error and grows large. Even after the controlled variable passes the setpoint and the error changes sign, the manipulated variable stays at its upper limit until the accumulated integral comes down, which causes a large overshoot and a long oscillation. As a countermeasure, anti-windup is used, which stops integrating or limits the integral while the output is saturated.
- A. This describes noise amplification by the derivative term.
- B. It has nothing to do with the length of the sampling period. With the period multiplied in correctly, the integral works as intended.
- C. Correct. It arises from the combination of actuator saturation and integration.