CMOS vs CCD Image Sensors: Differences Explained
Both sensors turn light into electric charge in each pixel; they differ in how that charge is read out. A CCD moves the charge pixel by pixel to a single output amplifier. A CMOS sensor converts charge to voltage inside each pixel and reads many pixels in parallel. CMOS sensors are cheaper, faster and use less power, and they can integrate ADCs and image processing on the same chip, so they have replaced CCDs in almost all consumer products.
| Aspect | CMOS image sensor | CCD image sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Readout | Each pixel has its own amplifier; signals are read out in parallel, usually through column ADCs | Charge is shifted pixel by pixel through the array to one or a few output amplifiers |
| Manufacturing | Standard CMOS-type process, built in common semiconductor fabs | Special process designed for charge transfer |
| On-chip functions | ADCs, timing and image processing can be integrated; stacked designs add logic and memory | Mostly only the sensor; supporting circuits are separate chips |
| Power consumption | Low | High, because charge transfer needs high-speed clocks and several supply voltages |
| Speed (frame rate) | High, thanks to parallel readout | Lower, limited by the serial transfer |
| Noise and uniformity | Once worse, now comparable or better thanks to pinned photodiodes and correlated double sampling | Traditionally low noise and uniform pixels |
| Shutter | Rolling shutter is common (fast subjects can look skewed); global shutter versions need extra pixel circuitry | Global shutter is natural in many designs |
| Blooming and smear | Less prone | More prone, because excess charge can spill into neighboring pixels |
| Cost | Low, thanks to mass production | Higher |
| Typical uses | Smartphones, digital cameras, automotive cameras, webcams | Scientific and astronomical cameras, some industrial, medical and space imaging |
Figures are typical orders of magnitude and vary by process generation and product.