System Architecture and Reliability

Among the approaches to improving system reliability, which corresponds to fault avoidance?

  1. AChoosing highly reliable parts and removing those likely to cause early failures by screening (such as burn-in) before shipment, so that failures themselves are less likely
  2. BMaking equipment redundant so that the system as a whole keeps its function even if part of it fails
  3. CMaking the system go into a safe state when a failure occurs
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Choosing highly reliable parts and removing those likely to cause early failures by screening (such as burn-in) before shipment, so that failures themselves are less likely

Fault avoidance is the approach of making failures themselves less likely through high-quality parts, thorough testing and screening, and preventive maintenance. Screening such as burn-in is done to remove, before shipment, the failures that belong to the early failure period of the bathtub curve. In contrast, fault tolerance accepts that failures will occur and keeps the function despite them, for example through redundancy. Going into a safe state on failure is the fail-safe concept.

  • A. Correct. This is the approach of making failures themselves less likely.
  • B. This is fault tolerance, keeping the function despite failures.
  • C. This is the fail-safe concept.
Practice this topic Back to topic

Related calculators

Books on System Architecture and Reliability Ad

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

More System Architecture and Reliability questions

  1. Which describes RAID 1?
  2. RAID 5 is built from four disks with a capacity of 4 TB each. Which is the capacity available for storing data?
  3. RAID 6 is built from six disks with a capacity of 8 TB each. Which is the correct combination of the capacity available for storing data and the number of disks that can fail at the same time without losing data?
  4. In a RAID 10 array of four disks (two mirrored pairs, striped across the two pairs), two of the four disks fail at the same time. If every pair of disks is equally likely to be the one that fails, which is the probability that data is lost?
  5. RAID 5 is built from four disks, each capable of 200 random input/output operations per second (IOPS). Each small random write requires four I/O operations in total: reading the old data and the old parity, and writing the new data and the new parity; cache effects are ignored. When only writes are performed, which is the number of writes the whole RAID 5 array can process?