Cyber Attacks and Defense in Practice
For ransomware damage, the loss per incident (SLE) is estimated at 40 million yen and the annual number of occurrences (ARO) at 0.5. Control A costs 6 million yen a year and reduces occurrences to 0.2 per year. Control B costs 3 million yen a year and does not change the number of occurrences but speeds up recovery, reducing the loss per incident to 24 million yen. With the annualized loss expectancy ALE = SLE × ARO and ROSI = (reduction in ALE − annual cost of the control) ÷ annual cost of the control, which of the following correctly gives the control with the larger ROSI and its value?
- AControl B, about 167%
- BControl A, 100%
- CControl B, about 267%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Control B, about 167%
The ALE before the controls is 40 million yen × 0.5 = 20 million yen. After control A it is 40 million yen × 0.2 = 8 million yen, a reduction of 12 million yen, and the ROSI is (12 − 6) ÷ 6 = 1.0, or 100%. After control B it is 24 million yen × 0.5 = 12 million yen, a reduction of 8 million yen, and the ROSI is (8 − 3) ÷ 3 ≈ 1.67, or about 167%, so B gives more effect per unit of cost. However, the net benefit (reduction − cost) is 6 million yen for A and 5 million yen for B, larger for A, so the decision considers both the ratio and the amount according to budget constraints.
- A. Correct. (8 − 3) ÷ 3 ≈ 1.67, which is larger than control A's 1.0.
- B. This is the ROSI of control A. A has the larger reduction in ALE (12 million yen), but its ROSI is smaller than B's.
- C. This value divides the reduction in ALE by the cost without subtracting the cost (8 ÷ 3 ≈ 2.67).
Continue: 9 more Cyber Attacks and Defense in Practice questions