Quantum Computing Hardware

Two qubits are in the entangled state (|00⟩ + |11⟩)/√2. Which statement is correct?

  1. AEven when the first qubit is measured, the second qubit stays in a state giving 0 and 1 with 50% probability each
  2. BIf measuring the first qubit gives 0, the second is certain to be 0, and if it gives 1, the second is certain to be 1
  3. CBy choosing the measurement result of the first qubit, information can be sent faster than light to the second qubit far away
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. If measuring the first qubit gives 0, the second is certain to be 0, and if it gives 1, the second is certain to be 1

This state is a superposition of |00⟩ and |11⟩ with no |01⟩ or |10⟩ component, so the two measurement results always agree. Looking at either qubit alone, 0 and 1 each appear 50% of the time, but the results are correlated in a way that two independent bits cannot explain; this is quantum entanglement. However, which result appears is random and cannot be chosen by the person measuring, so entanglement cannot be used to send information faster than light. In a quantum computer, the quality of the two-qubit gates that create entanglement strongly affects performance.

  • A. This describes two qubits that are not entangled (independent). In this state the two results always agree.
  • B. Correct. There is no |01⟩ or |10⟩ component, so the results always match.
  • C. The result is random and cannot be chosen by the person measuring; the correlation only becomes visible when the results are compared later. Information cannot be sent faster than light.
Practice this topic Back to topic

Books on Quantum Computing Hardware Ad

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

More Quantum Computing Hardware questions

  1. Which correctly describes what a single-qubit X gate does?
  2. A qubit in the state |0⟩ has a Hadamard (H) gate applied once and is then measured. What is the probability of getting 1?
  3. Starting from the two-qubit state |00⟩ (the left digit is the first qubit), an H gate is applied to the first qubit, followed by a CNOT gate with the first qubit as control and the second as target. What is the resulting state?
  4. Gates H, Z and H are applied in that order to a qubit in |0⟩, which is then measured. What is the probability of getting 1?
  5. Why can't quantum error correction directly use the classical approach of making three copies of the data and taking a majority vote?