Cyber Attacks and Defense in Practice
Evidence from an incident investigation, such as a copy of a disk, is to be handled so that it can later be used in litigation or in a report to the police. Which of the following handling is the most appropriate according to the idea of chain of custody?
- ATo speed up the investigation, open and examine the original disk directly, and have the person in charge remember what they noticed without recording it
- BOnce a copy has been made the original disk is no longer needed, so wipe it immediately and reuse it in a device for other work to save money
- CCopy the original disk through a device that prevents writes, and record the hash values and who received it when and what they did with it
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Copy the original disk through a device that prevents writes, and record the hash values and who received it when and what they did with it
For evidence to be trusted in court and elsewhere, it must be shown that there was no tampering or substitution between its collection and its submission. The original media are therefore accessed only through a device that prevents writes (a write blocker), a bit-for-bit copy is made, and it is recorded that the hash values (such as SHA-256) of the original and the copy match. The copy is what gets examined; the original media are sealed and stored, and the date and time, the person in charge and the purpose are recorded at every handover. A break in this record is a reason for the reliability of the evidence to be doubted.
- A. Examining the original media directly may change their contents, and without records it is impossible to show what was done.
- B. The original media are kept, among other things, to confirm later that the copy is correct.
- C. Correct. The key points are showing with hash values that there was no tampering and keeping the record of handovers unbroken.
Continue: 9 more Cyber Attacks and Defense in Practice questions